Why King Abdullah’s visit is a farce

King Abdullah

The Queen gets to meet King Abdullah today, after he and 6 plane loads of advisors and aides arrived in London (probably on a shopping spree and partaking in vices not allowed at home).

The state visit with all the trimmings (again costing British taxpayers millions) is the first for 20 years.

Why are we allowing it to go ahead?

Kim Howells, the Foreign Office minister, was telling us again that we should work more closely with the Saudis, because we “share values” with them. And what values precisely would they be, I might ask?

Their terrible record on human rights?

Vince Cable, the acting leader of the Liberal Democrats, announced that he was boycotting the visit and pulling out of the Palace banquet.

“By any standards, and in the assessment of our own Foreign Office, the human rights record of this Government is absolutely appalling,” said Dr Cable. “They point to the systematic discrimination against women, people of other religions, the exercise of systematic corporal punishment, through amputation, the public beheadings.”

British officials insisted that the Government did regularly raise human rights concerns with the Saudi authorities, although discussions are more likely to be dominated by regional crises, counter-terrorist cooperation and commercial ties, worth £3.5 billion a year to British exporters. So it all boils down to money?

It now also revealed that the agenda of hate in British mosques is linked to Saudis. Extremist literature calling for the execution of gays and the oppression of women is being distributed in British mosques.

Researchers found radical or hate-filled books and pamphlets at a quarter of the 100 Islamic religious institutions they visited.

They said much of the literature is linked to agencies of the Saudi Arabian government.

Saudi King Abdullah  immediately triggered controversy by accusing Britain of not doing enough to tackle terrorism (people in glass house comes to mind). The claims were hotly denied by the Government.

The sad, awful truth is that we fete these people, we fawn on them, we supply them with fighter jets, whisky and whores. As our close allies across the pond treat them the same (the last figures show that Saudi own 7% of the USA) must we follow suit? How much of the UK belongs to them?

Threatening to nuke us? Let us show you how

Nuclear PhysicsThe Foreign Office are up to their usual tricks, yet again.

They have cleared dozens of Iranians to enter British universities to study advanced nuclear physics and other studies, which could have the potential to be applied to weapons of mass distruction.

Over 60 Iranians have been admitted to study postgraduate courses deemd ‘proliferation-sensitive’ by the security services.

The Foreign Office has admitted that it was reviewing the vetting for sensitive areas of study and plan to announce an overhaul within the next few weeks.

With all that is going off in the Middle East and Iranians refusal to comply with international demands to open it’s country’s nuclear program to inspection you think that they would be a little more on the ball.

Keeping an eye on you FO, what do you class as a few weeks? (Now that someone has pointed out how useless you are, at the taxpayers expense)

If we get a nuke heading in our direction, the probability that we showed them how to do it is frightening.

More Articles

The government’s increasing immigration carbon footprint

BBC, time to shoot Aunty?

Met chief from another planet?

Naff week for English sport

FA backs McClaren

‘Serious Failings’ With ITV Phone-Ins

Italian Stallion?

England playing Russian Roulette?